<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 459 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448060</link>
    <description>Repeated acknowledgments of the corporate debtor&#039;s liability in financial statements, together with the assignment arrangement and its event-of-default clause, supported revival of the earlier financial contracts once SBI&#039;s communication showed the receivables were already encumbered. On that basis, limitation had to be computed with reference to the acknowledgments, the assignment date and the exclusion applicable during the COVID-19 period. The resolution professional was required to collate and verify the claim, and the rejection of the claim on limitation was not sustainable on the admitted facts and contractual terms. The claim was therefore held not to be time-barred and the impugned rejection was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 09:21:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 459 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448060</link>
      <description>Repeated acknowledgments of the corporate debtor&#039;s liability in financial statements, together with the assignment arrangement and its event-of-default clause, supported revival of the earlier financial contracts once SBI&#039;s communication showed the receivables were already encumbered. On that basis, limitation had to be computed with reference to the acknowledgments, the assignment date and the exclusion applicable during the COVID-19 period. The resolution professional was required to collate and verify the claim, and the rejection of the claim on limitation was not sustainable on the admitted facts and contractual terms. The claim was therefore held not to be time-barred and the impugned rejection was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>