<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 457 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448058</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chandigarh held that while sub-contractors remain liable for service tax on cargo handling services even when main contractors have paid tax on total consideration, the extended period of limitation cannot be invoked for service tax demands. The show cause notice issued in February 2007 for period 2002-03 to 2004-05 was time-barred under normal limitation period. Appeal allowed solely on limitation grounds with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 457 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448058</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chandigarh held that while sub-contractors remain liable for service tax on cargo handling services even when main contractors have paid tax on total consideration, the extended period of limitation cannot be invoked for service tax demands. The show cause notice issued in February 2007 for period 2002-03 to 2004-05 was time-barred under normal limitation period. Appeal allowed solely on limitation grounds with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>