https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311725 Revisional jurisdiction at the instance of a private complainant cannot be used to convert an acquittal into conviction, directly or indirectly, because Section 401(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 bars that course. Where the High Court concluded that a graver offence was made out and remanded the matter for a fresh conviction and sentence, leaving the trial court with no real discretion, the interference amounted to an impermissible indirect conversion of acquittal into conviction. The remand was therefore held unsustainable and was set aside, with restoration of the trial court's order. en-us Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Mar 2024 15:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311725 Revisional jurisdiction at the instance of a private complainant cannot be used to convert an acquittal into conviction, directly or indirectly, because Section 401(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 bars that course. Where the High Court concluded that a graver offence was made out and remanded the matter for a fresh conviction and sentence, leaving the trial court with no real discretion, the interference amounted to an impermissible indirect conversion of acquittal into conviction. The remand was therefore held unsustainable and was set aside, with restoration of the trial court's order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311725