<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1438 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311719</link>
    <description>The HC declared Sections 3(1) and 5 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 unconstitutional due to their overly broad and arbitrary nature, violating substantive due process. Consequently, notices issued under Section 24(1) were invalidated, and related proceedings were quashed. The Court emphasized the necessity for clarity and safeguards in the Act&#039;s provisions, resulting in the disposal of the writ petitions in favor of the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 09:21:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1438 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311719</link>
      <description>The HC declared Sections 3(1) and 5 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 unconstitutional due to their overly broad and arbitrary nature, violating substantive due process. Consequently, notices issued under Section 24(1) were invalidated, and related proceedings were quashed. The Court emphasized the necessity for clarity and safeguards in the Act&#039;s provisions, resulting in the disposal of the writ petitions in favor of the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>