https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311712 A development project exemption from the statutory regime did not extinguish a separate contractual obligation to bear proportionate infrastructure development cost, because the agreement treated "infrastructure development" as broad enough to include external development works. The State could not deny all concessions merely because the original time schedule expired where it had itself extended time and considered further rescheduling. Promissory estoppel, legitimate expectation, and discrimination could not override the express contractual liability, though the agreement and policy still supported relief against change of land use charges and the social infrastructure fund demand, with licence fee to be computed only for the non-industrial component. en-us Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jan 2024 09:21:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311712 A development project exemption from the statutory regime did not extinguish a separate contractual obligation to bear proportionate infrastructure development cost, because the agreement treated "infrastructure development" as broad enough to include external development works. The State could not deny all concessions merely because the original time schedule expired where it had itself extended time and considered further rescheduling. Promissory estoppel, legitimate expectation, and discrimination could not override the express contractual liability, though the agreement and policy still supported relief against change of land use charges and the social infrastructure fund demand, with licence fee to be computed only for the non-industrial component. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311712