<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 432 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448033</link>
    <description>HC addressed a dispute involving tax authorities nullifying previous court orders. The court found the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s actions improperly challenged the original High Court ruling. The court directed the review application be heard by the original bench, prevented further steps under the show cause notice, and emphasized administrative authorities must respect judicial decisions. The ruling upheld judicial precedence and procedural integrity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 432 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448033</link>
      <description>HC addressed a dispute involving tax authorities nullifying previous court orders. The court found the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s actions improperly challenged the original High Court ruling. The court directed the review application be heard by the original bench, prevented further steps under the show cause notice, and emphasized administrative authorities must respect judicial decisions. The ruling upheld judicial precedence and procedural integrity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>