<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 428 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448029</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed several SLPs, opting not to interfere with the Rajasthan HC&#039;s judgments. In SLP (C) No. 8228/2018, the petition was dismissed, and pending applications were disposed of. SLP (C) No. 9210/2018 was dismissed due to a lower tax effect. SLP (C) Nos. 16545/2018 and 16544/2018 were ordered to be considered with SLP (C) No. 10460/2018. SLP (C) No. 23262/2018 was adjourned for two weeks for further verification of related pending matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 428 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448029</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed several SLPs, opting not to interfere with the Rajasthan HC&#039;s judgments. In SLP (C) No. 8228/2018, the petition was dismissed, and pending applications were disposed of. SLP (C) No. 9210/2018 was dismissed due to a lower tax effect. SLP (C) Nos. 16545/2018 and 16544/2018 were ordered to be considered with SLP (C) No. 10460/2018. SLP (C) No. 23262/2018 was adjourned for two weeks for further verification of related pending matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>