<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 41 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35366</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, rejecting the revenue&#039;s claims and ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of provision for warranty for the assessment year 2002-03. The Court held that warranty provision is deductible under section 37 of the Income Tax Act if a reliable estimate of the liability can be made, citing precedents such as Rotork Controls India P. Ltd. v. CIT and CIT III v. M/s. FL Smedth Ltd.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 41 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35366</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, rejecting the revenue&#039;s claims and ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of provision for warranty for the assessment year 2002-03. The Court held that warranty provision is deductible under section 37 of the Income Tax Act if a reliable estimate of the liability can be made, citing precedents such as Rotork Controls India P. Ltd. v. CIT and CIT III v. M/s. FL Smedth Ltd.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>