https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448002 Under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002, the validity of arrest turned on communication of the grounds of arrest and prompt forwarding of arrest material to the Adjudicating Authority. The Court stated that the Supreme Court's requirement in Pankaj Bansal to furnish grounds in writing applied prospectively and did not control an arrest made on 09.06.2023; at that time, oral communication remained legally sufficient. On the facts, the contemporaneous record, signatures on the grounds document, witness countersignatures, and connected remand papers supported compliance. Transmission to the Adjudicating Authority on the next working day after a Friday night arrest was treated as sufficient immediacy. en-us Mon, 08 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jan 2024 09:19:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448002 Under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002, the validity of arrest turned on communication of the grounds of arrest and prompt forwarding of arrest material to the Adjudicating Authority. The Court stated that the Supreme Court's requirement in Pankaj Bansal to furnish grounds in writing applied prospectively and did not control an arrest made on 09.06.2023; at that time, oral communication remained legally sufficient. On the facts, the contemporaneous record, signatures on the grounds document, witness countersignatures, and connected remand papers supported compliance. Transmission to the Adjudicating Authority on the next working day after a Friday night arrest was treated as sufficient immediacy. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 08 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448002