<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 385 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447986</link>
    <description>CESTAT Allahabad ruled on appropriation of sanctioned refund, dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeal. Following precedents from Delhi Bench in Computer Sciences Corporation case and Chandigarh Bench in Pepsico case, the Tribunal held that when assessed liability under adjudication order is set aside, the petitioner becomes entitled to refund. Since the demand itself was set aside by the Tribunal, the appropriation order was deemed unsustainable and was consequently set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 18:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 385 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447986</link>
      <description>CESTAT Allahabad ruled on appropriation of sanctioned refund, dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeal. Following precedents from Delhi Bench in Computer Sciences Corporation case and Chandigarh Bench in Pepsico case, the Tribunal held that when assessed liability under adjudication order is set aside, the petitioner becomes entitled to refund. Since the demand itself was set aside by the Tribunal, the appropriation order was deemed unsustainable and was consequently set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>