<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 690 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311704</link>
    <description>Where allegations of cheating, forgery, criminal breach of trust and conspiracy are partly connected to one local area and partly to another, criminal jurisdiction for inquiry and trial may attach under the provisions governing place of offence and accounting obligations. The complaint&#039;s assertions that fraudulent representations and accounting duties arose in Calcutta were sufficient to sustain the Magistrate&#039;s competence to entertain the complaint and order investigation. A transfer direction was not upheld in the form made because it was vague and did not identify a workable investigative destination, although extraordinary jurisdiction could be used to secure investigation without displacing the criminal court&#039;s final jurisdictional decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 14:38:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 690 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311704</link>
      <description>Where allegations of cheating, forgery, criminal breach of trust and conspiracy are partly connected to one local area and partly to another, criminal jurisdiction for inquiry and trial may attach under the provisions governing place of offence and accounting obligations. The complaint&#039;s assertions that fraudulent representations and accounting duties arose in Calcutta were sufficient to sustain the Magistrate&#039;s competence to entertain the complaint and order investigation. A transfer direction was not upheld in the form made because it was vague and did not identify a workable investigative destination, although extraordinary jurisdiction could be used to secure investigation without displacing the criminal court&#039;s final jurisdictional decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>