https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447966 The HC dismissed the appellant/revenue's appeal regarding AY 2007-08, affirming the ITAT's decision to exclude certain comparables due to functional dissimilarities with the respondent/assessee. The Tribunal's findings highlighted the distinct nature of services provided by Accentia, Eclerx, Mold-Tek, and TSR. Consequently, the Court found no substantial question of law and declined to intervene, directing parties to proceed based on the digitally signed order. en-us Mon, 18 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Dec 2024 15:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447966 The HC dismissed the appellant/revenue's appeal regarding AY 2007-08, affirming the ITAT's decision to exclude certain comparables due to functional dissimilarities with the respondent/assessee. The Tribunal's findings highlighted the distinct nature of services provided by Accentia, Eclerx, Mold-Tek, and TSR. Consequently, the Court found no substantial question of law and declined to intervene, directing parties to proceed based on the digitally signed order. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 18 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447966