https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447964 The court condoned a 220-day delay in re-filing an appeal concerning Assessment Year 2015-16, allowing the case to proceed on its merits. The appellant/revenue's challenge to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order was influenced by a Supreme Court decision on a related matter. The Tribunal had directed the Assessing Officer to adopt a specific attribution rate for the respondent/assessee's Indian operations. As the Supreme Court had affirmed a similar decision for a previous year and no substantial legal question arose, the appeals were closed. The court instructed the registry to send the order to the respondent/assessee by all available means. en-us Tue, 12 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jan 2024 14:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447964 The court condoned a 220-day delay in re-filing an appeal concerning Assessment Year 2015-16, allowing the case to proceed on its merits. The appellant/revenue's challenge to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order was influenced by a Supreme Court decision on a related matter. The Tribunal had directed the Assessing Officer to adopt a specific attribution rate for the respondent/assessee's Indian operations. As the Supreme Court had affirmed a similar decision for a previous year and no substantial legal question arose, the appeals were closed. The court instructed the registry to send the order to the respondent/assessee by all available means. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 12 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447964