<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 348 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447949</link>
    <description>CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal challenging suspension of customs broker license. The Principal Commissioner had suspended the license alleging violations of CBLR 2018 Regulations 10(d) and 10(m) for incomplete declaration of imported goods and mandatory certifications. CESTAT found no evidence of purposeful mis-declaration by the customs broker who had filed bills based on available invoices and packing lists. The tribunal noted proper BIS certificates were submitted during investigation. Crucially, CESTAT held natural justice was violated as the broker was denied cross-examination opportunity during inquiry proceedings, citing precedent from Telangana HC. The impugned order was set aside and license suspension revoked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 08:35:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 348 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447949</link>
      <description>CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal challenging suspension of customs broker license. The Principal Commissioner had suspended the license alleging violations of CBLR 2018 Regulations 10(d) and 10(m) for incomplete declaration of imported goods and mandatory certifications. CESTAT found no evidence of purposeful mis-declaration by the customs broker who had filed bills based on available invoices and packing lists. The tribunal noted proper BIS certificates were submitted during investigation. Crucially, CESTAT held natural justice was violated as the broker was denied cross-examination opportunity during inquiry proceedings, citing precedent from Telangana HC. The impugned order was set aside and license suspension revoked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>