<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 339 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447940</link>
    <description>Multiple hearings and permission to file reply and written submissions showed that the corporate debtor was not denied a fair opportunity before the Adjudicating Authority, so that objection failed. The record also supported financial debt and default: appropriation of pledged FDRs did not regularise the account because replenishment was not made, and OTS and restructuring communications acknowledging NPA status amounted to admission of liability and default. Those written acknowledgments, made within three years of default, extended limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, making the Section 7 application timely. Section 10A did not apply because the default arose before the protected period commenced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 08:34:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 339 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447940</link>
      <description>Multiple hearings and permission to file reply and written submissions showed that the corporate debtor was not denied a fair opportunity before the Adjudicating Authority, so that objection failed. The record also supported financial debt and default: appropriation of pledged FDRs did not regularise the account because replenishment was not made, and OTS and restructuring communications acknowledging NPA status amounted to admission of liability and default. Those written acknowledgments, made within three years of default, extended limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, making the Section 7 application timely. Section 10A did not apply because the default arose before the protected period commenced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>