https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447937 Under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, maintainability of an intra-court appeal depends on the nature of the jurisdiction exercised and the subject-matter of the proceeding. An order passed under Article 226 quashing criminal proceedings was treated as falling within criminal jurisdiction for this purpose, so the writ appeals were barred despite the writ forum. The court applied the settled principle that the criminal character of the underlying subject-matter governs maintainability, and the challenge to the Single Judge's order failed at the threshold. en-us Fri, 05 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jan 2024 11:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447937 Under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, maintainability of an intra-court appeal depends on the nature of the jurisdiction exercised and the subject-matter of the proceeding. An order passed under Article 226 quashing criminal proceedings was treated as falling within criminal jurisdiction for this purpose, so the writ appeals were barred despite the writ forum. The court applied the settled principle that the criminal character of the underlying subject-matter governs maintainability, and the challenge to the Single Judge's order failed at the threshold. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 05 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447937