https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447936 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, finding that the Department's attempt to impose Service Tax under multiple headings for a composite contract was unjustified. The Tribunal held that such contracts could not be divided for tax purposes, setting aside the Department's demand. The Commissioner(Appeals) had upheld the demand for 'Cargo Handling Services' before 06.06.2007, but the Tribunal found this contradictory and also set aside that order, granting the appellant consequential benefits. en-us Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jan 2024 08:34:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447936 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, finding that the Department's attempt to impose Service Tax under multiple headings for a composite contract was unjustified. The Tribunal held that such contracts could not be divided for tax purposes, setting aside the Department's demand. The Commissioner(Appeals) had upheld the demand for 'Cargo Handling Services' before 06.06.2007, but the Tribunal found this contradictory and also set aside that order, granting the appellant consequential benefits. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447936