https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447931 The Bombay HC held that the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax's rejection of the petitioner's CST refund claim violated principles of natural justice due to inadequate reasoning. The court found that the refund application raised substantive grounds requiring detailed consideration, but the authority provided insufficient reasons for rejection. The HC directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the refund claim de novo and pass appropriate assessment orders with adequate reasoning in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of with directions for fresh adjudication. en-us Tue, 02 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jan 2024 08:34:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447931 The Bombay HC held that the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax's rejection of the petitioner's CST refund claim violated principles of natural justice due to inadequate reasoning. The court found that the refund application raised substantive grounds requiring detailed consideration, but the authority provided insufficient reasons for rejection. The HC directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the refund claim de novo and pass appropriate assessment orders with adequate reasoning in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of with directions for fresh adjudication. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 02 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447931