<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 328 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447929</link>
    <description>The High Court&#039;s cancellation of bail and suspension of sentence was upheld because the settlement undertaking was not complied with within the stipulated time. The recorded undertaking expressly made default fatal to the benefit of interim protection, including withdrawal of bail and suspension of sentence. The complainant was not bound by the private inter se arrangement between the two convicted directors on allocation of liability; the accepted settlement concerned only payment of the total agreed amount. As the full amount had not been paid, the condition attached to the grant of protection was triggered and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2024 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 328 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447929</link>
      <description>The High Court&#039;s cancellation of bail and suspension of sentence was upheld because the settlement undertaking was not complied with within the stipulated time. The recorded undertaking expressly made default fatal to the benefit of interim protection, including withdrawal of bail and suspension of sentence. The complainant was not bound by the private inter se arrangement between the two convicted directors on allocation of liability; the accepted settlement concerned only payment of the total agreed amount. As the full amount had not been paid, the condition attached to the grant of protection was triggered and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>