<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 44 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35348</link>
    <description>The court held that the notice issued under Section 148 for reopening the assessment was quashed as there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose all material facts necessary for the assessment. The court emphasized that the conditions for reassessment must be strictly met and that a mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer does not justify reopening the assessment. The petition was allowed, the notice was quashed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 44 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35348</link>
      <description>The court held that the notice issued under Section 148 for reopening the assessment was quashed as there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose all material facts necessary for the assessment. The court emphasized that the conditions for reassessment must be strictly met and that a mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer does not justify reopening the assessment. The petition was allowed, the notice was quashed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>