https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311688 Dispute between rival groups over control and management of a registered society was treated as unsuitable for writ adjudication because the governing statute provided a specific dispute-resolution mechanism, including arbitration. With the parties consenting to appointment of an arbitrator, the matter was referred to arbitration, and all factual and legal contentions were kept open for determination by the arbitrator. The Court did not decide the interpretation of Section 9 of the Act on merits and left that question open. en-us Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jan 2024 20:47:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311688 Dispute between rival groups over control and management of a registered society was treated as unsuitable for writ adjudication because the governing statute provided a specific dispute-resolution mechanism, including arbitration. With the parties consenting to appointment of an arbitrator, the matter was referred to arbitration, and all factual and legal contentions were kept open for determination by the arbitrator. The Court did not decide the interpretation of Section 9 of the Act on merits and left that question open. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311688