https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311673 Suspension of Port Trust officers was upheld where the selective suspension challenge lacked factual basis because only service-related accused could be suspended by the employer, while other accused were outside its control. The Court also held that approval by the Central Government under the service regulation was sufficient, and the approving authority could reconsider an earlier non-suspension view before granting approval. Suspension orders referring to both contemplated disciplinary proceedings and a pending criminal case were not inconsistent, as the two grounds were concurrent rather than mutually exclusive. A retirement-based challenge was not entertained in these writ petitions. en-us Thu, 15 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jan 2024 11:03:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311673 Suspension of Port Trust officers was upheld where the selective suspension challenge lacked factual basis because only service-related accused could be suspended by the employer, while other accused were outside its control. The Court also held that approval by the Central Government under the service regulation was sufficient, and the approving authority could reconsider an earlier non-suspension view before granting approval. Suspension orders referring to both contemplated disciplinary proceedings and a pending criminal case were not inconsistent, as the two grounds were concurrent rather than mutually exclusive. A retirement-based challenge was not entertained in these writ petitions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311673