https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311672 A SAFEMA show cause notice based on a detention order that had already been revoked could not be sustained, because the Act applies only where a valid and subsisting detention order exists. The revocation of detention under COFEPOSA and the General Clauses Act was effective in law even if it was not expressed in the exact language of SAFEMA's proviso. Once the detention order ceased to exist, the jurisdictional foundation for SAFEMA proceedings disappeared, and the notice was therefore without jurisdiction and liable to be set aside. en-us Fri, 27 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jan 2024 10:59:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311672 A SAFEMA show cause notice based on a detention order that had already been revoked could not be sustained, because the Act applies only where a valid and subsisting detention order exists. The revocation of detention under COFEPOSA and the General Clauses Act was effective in law even if it was not expressed in the exact language of SAFEMA's proviso. Once the detention order ceased to exist, the jurisdictional foundation for SAFEMA proceedings disappeared, and the notice was therefore without jurisdiction and liable to be set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311672