<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 42 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35342</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for a false claim under the DEPB scheme. The Court found no legal basis to interfere, emphasizing the honest difference of opinion at the time of filing the return. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 42 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35342</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for a false claim under the DEPB scheme. The Court found no legal basis to interfere, emphasizing the honest difference of opinion at the time of filing the return. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>