https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311669 The Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 and university statutes were read to give the Vice-Chancellor supervisory authority over academic standards, including incidental power to withdraw or cancel approval of a lecturer's appointment when justified. That power was upheld because approval formed part of the continuing regulatory scheme, and action taken pursuant to the Chancellor's direction was not beyond jurisdiction. Allegations of mala fides and bias were rejected as vague and unsupported by particulars, and pending proceedings under section 108 did not bar compliance with the Chancellor's communication. A conviction involving moral turpitude was treated as a valid basis for withdrawal of approval in the academic interest of the University. en-us Fri, 03 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jan 2024 10:16:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311669 The Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 and university statutes were read to give the Vice-Chancellor supervisory authority over academic standards, including incidental power to withdraw or cancel approval of a lecturer's appointment when justified. That power was upheld because approval formed part of the continuing regulatory scheme, and action taken pursuant to the Chancellor's direction was not beyond jurisdiction. Allegations of mala fides and bias were rejected as vague and unsupported by particulars, and pending proceedings under section 108 did not bar compliance with the Chancellor's communication. A conviction involving moral turpitude was treated as a valid basis for withdrawal of approval in the academic interest of the University. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311669