<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 321 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447922</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction was held ordinarily inappropriate where rejection of refund turned on contested factual issues and the statutory appellate remedy remained available, so the petitioner was relegated to appeal. No violation of natural justice was found because a show-cause notice had been issued and responded to, and the case was not one of a curable defect in the refund application. The document states that interference was declined and the refund rejection stood to be challenged through the appellate route.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 321 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447922</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction was held ordinarily inappropriate where rejection of refund turned on contested factual issues and the statutory appellate remedy remained available, so the petitioner was relegated to appeal. No violation of natural justice was found because a show-cause notice had been issued and responded to, and the case was not one of a curable defect in the refund application. The document states that interference was declined and the refund rejection stood to be challenged through the appellate route.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>