<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1283 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311664</link>
    <description>A procedural objection to filing an appeal manually, instead of through the portal, could not justify dismissal without examining the merits. The High Court treated the defect as procedural, held that the appellate authority should have considered the appeal substantively, and set aside the impugned order. The matter was remanded to the appellate authority for fresh decision on merits after affording both parties an opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1283 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311664</link>
      <description>A procedural objection to filing an appeal manually, instead of through the portal, could not justify dismissal without examining the merits. The High Court treated the defect as procedural, held that the appellate authority should have considered the appeal substantively, and set aside the impugned order. The matter was remanded to the appellate authority for fresh decision on merits after affording both parties an opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>