https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311660 An administrative delisting action with serious civil consequences must rest on cogent reasons, proved relevant facts and consideration of material such as inspection, certification and acceptance of supplies. Where no defect or non-conformity is demonstrated, reliance on speculation, irrelevant material or conjecture is unsustainable and may attract judicial review on grounds of unreasonableness and disproportionality. A later procurement specification cannot be applied retrospectively to supplies made before it came into force, because a norm not in existence at the relevant time cannot invalidate prior conduct absent breach of then-applicable requirements. The impugned delisting action was quashed and the affected party was entitled to participate in the tenders. en-us Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 07 Jan 2024 21:01:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311660 An administrative delisting action with serious civil consequences must rest on cogent reasons, proved relevant facts and consideration of material such as inspection, certification and acceptance of supplies. Where no defect or non-conformity is demonstrated, reliance on speculation, irrelevant material or conjecture is unsustainable and may attract judicial review on grounds of unreasonableness and disproportionality. A later procurement specification cannot be applied retrospectively to supplies made before it came into force, because a norm not in existence at the relevant time cannot invalidate prior conduct absent breach of then-applicable requirements. The impugned delisting action was quashed and the affected party was entitled to participate in the tenders. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311660