https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311657 A party not impleaded as a co-claimant in arbitration cannot, at the execution stage, enlarge the arbitral award by claiming to be a co-decree holder or execute it in its own name. The Delhi HC noted that the award was made in favour of the consortium as such, while the applicant had only been arrayed as a respondent and had been left to pursue independent proceedings. Issues about the inter se entitlement of persons claiming through the same party were held to fall outside execution and beyond Section 47 CPC. The application for impleadment was therefore rejected. en-us Mon, 14 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 07 Jan 2024 21:01:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311657 A party not impleaded as a co-claimant in arbitration cannot, at the execution stage, enlarge the arbitral award by claiming to be a co-decree holder or execute it in its own name. The Delhi HC noted that the award was made in favour of the consortium as such, while the applicant had only been arrayed as a respondent and had been left to pursue independent proceedings. Issues about the inter se entitlement of persons claiming through the same party were held to fall outside execution and beyond Section 47 CPC. The application for impleadment was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311657