https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311655 In a fair-rent reference under Clause 36 of the Letters Patent, the court held that the appellate figure could be revisited where the trial court's comparative method lacked cogent material or was perverse. The additional appeal record undermined the assumption that the Old Post Office Street property should command materially less rent than the R.N. Mukherjee Road property. On the comparative evidence, the suit premises were treated as comparable but more valuable, justifying an enhancement over the benchmark and fixing the 1995 rent at Rs.24 per sq. ft. per month. en-us Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 07 Jan 2024 21:01:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311655 In a fair-rent reference under Clause 36 of the Letters Patent, the court held that the appellate figure could be revisited where the trial court's comparative method lacked cogent material or was perverse. The additional appeal record undermined the assumption that the Old Post Office Street property should command materially less rent than the R.N. Mukherjee Road property. On the comparative evidence, the suit premises were treated as comparable but more valuable, justifying an enhancement over the benchmark and fixing the 1995 rent at Rs.24 per sq. ft. per month. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311655