https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311650 Security for costs under Section 117(1) of the Representation of the People Act was treated as substantially complied with where the amount was deposited within time through the High Court's prescribed challan and lodgment procedure, the procedural mode being directory. The Court also held that a photograph forming an integral part of a pleaded corrupt practice allegation had to be served with the election petition under Section 81(3), read with Section 83(2); omission to supply it meant the copy served was not a true and complete copy. The security deposit objection failed, but non-service of the photograph constituted fatal non-compliance, so dismissal of the election petition was upheld on that ground. en-us Thu, 31 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jan 2024 13:08:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311650 Security for costs under Section 117(1) of the Representation of the People Act was treated as substantially complied with where the amount was deposited within time through the High Court's prescribed challan and lodgment procedure, the procedural mode being directory. The Court also held that a photograph forming an integral part of a pleaded corrupt practice allegation had to be served with the election petition under Section 81(3), read with Section 83(2); omission to supply it meant the copy served was not a true and complete copy. The security deposit objection failed, but non-service of the photograph constituted fatal non-compliance, so dismissal of the election petition was upheld on that ground. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 31 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311650