<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 283 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447884</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the refund application rejection. The court set aside the original order due to procedural irregularities, technical glitches, and improper document assessment. The matter was remitted to the adjudicating authority for re-evaluation within eight weeks, instructing a comprehensive review of submitted documents and permitting additional clarifications if required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 283 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447884</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the refund application rejection. The court set aside the original order due to procedural irregularities, technical glitches, and improper document assessment. The matter was remitted to the adjudicating authority for re-evaluation within eight weeks, instructing a comprehensive review of submitted documents and permitting additional clarifications if required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>