<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 273 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447874</link>
    <description>DELHI HC held the reassessment under s.147/s.148 invalid because the AO triggered proceedings without independent application of mind, relying on borrowed satisfaction and failing to consider or articulate reasons based on the material allegedly showing accommodation entries. The court found opacity in the record, absence of proper enquiries and non-use of crucial letters available to the AO, and concluded the notice and order could not be sustained. Decision for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 15:26:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 273 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447874</link>
      <description>DELHI HC held the reassessment under s.147/s.148 invalid because the AO triggered proceedings without independent application of mind, relying on borrowed satisfaction and failing to consider or articulate reasons based on the material allegedly showing accommodation entries. The court found opacity in the record, absence of proper enquiries and non-use of crucial letters available to the AO, and concluded the notice and order could not be sustained. Decision for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>