https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447857 The tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling that the goods were not liable for confiscation, and no redemption fine or penalty could be imposed on the appellant. The tribunal found that the suspension of the supplier's GST registration did not prove the supplier's non-existence, and the market survey conducted without the appellant's representative violated principles of natural justice. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. en-us Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jan 2024 07:37:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447857 The tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling that the goods were not liable for confiscation, and no redemption fine or penalty could be imposed on the appellant. The tribunal found that the suspension of the supplier's GST registration did not prove the supplier's non-existence, and the market survey conducted without the appellant's representative violated principles of natural justice. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447857