<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 254 - NATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447855</link>
    <description>A statutory certificate supporting a tax deduction must be issued only after obtaining sufficient appropriate evidence and exercising due diligence and professional skepticism. The authority found that the chartered accountant failed to verify the foundational eligibility conditions for Form 10DA under section 80JJAA, including reorganisation restrictions, employee-count increase, exclusion of certain government-funded EPF employees, prescribed banking-mode payment, and the salary ceiling. Reliance on management representations and incomplete sample checks was held insufficient. Professional misconduct was therefore proved, and a monetary penalty was imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2024 07:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 254 - NATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447855</link>
      <description>A statutory certificate supporting a tax deduction must be issued only after obtaining sufficient appropriate evidence and exercising due diligence and professional skepticism. The authority found that the chartered accountant failed to verify the foundational eligibility conditions for Form 10DA under section 80JJAA, including reorganisation restrictions, employee-count increase, exclusion of certain government-funded EPF employees, prescribed banking-mode payment, and the salary ceiling. Reliance on management representations and incomplete sample checks was held insufficient. Professional misconduct was therefore proved, and a monetary penalty was imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>