https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311643 Writ jurisdiction was declined against notices that had culminated in assessment orders under the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 because an efficacious statutory appeal was available. The challenge was not limited to the legality of the notices but extended to valuation of accessories, interest and penalty, all of which required factual adjudication by the appellate forum. In tax matters, where the dispute is not purely jurisdictional and can be examined under the statutory scheme, Article 226 relief is ordinarily not entertained. The petitioners were left to pursue the prescribed appellate remedy. en-us Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jan 2024 21:52:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311643 Writ jurisdiction was declined against notices that had culminated in assessment orders under the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 because an efficacious statutory appeal was available. The challenge was not limited to the legality of the notices but extended to valuation of accessories, interest and penalty, all of which required factual adjudication by the appellate forum. In tax matters, where the dispute is not purely jurisdictional and can be examined under the statutory scheme, Article 226 relief is ordinarily not entertained. The petitioners were left to pursue the prescribed appellate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311643