<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1530 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311639</link>
    <description>Gains from transfer of compulsorily convertible debentures were held not to be taxable as interest income under Section 2(28A) and Article 11 of the India-Mauritius treaty, because the legal character of the instrument was not altered by the surrounding commercial arrangements. The Tribunal relied on the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s view that the joint venture was a genuine commercial venture, there was no basis to disregard the debentures or treat the entities as a single unit, and that ruling continued to govern the issue despite the pendency of the Revenue&#039;s special leave petition. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 21:52:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1530 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311639</link>
      <description>Gains from transfer of compulsorily convertible debentures were held not to be taxable as interest income under Section 2(28A) and Article 11 of the India-Mauritius treaty, because the legal character of the instrument was not altered by the surrounding commercial arrangements. The Tribunal relied on the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s view that the joint venture was a genuine commercial venture, there was no basis to disregard the debentures or treat the entities as a single unit, and that ruling continued to govern the issue despite the pendency of the Revenue&#039;s special leave petition. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>