<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reconsideration Ordered for Penalty Case After Misclassification of Book Entries as Cash Transactions.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73987</link>
    <description>Stay of demand / waiver of pre-deposit - Penalty u/s 271E - Allegation of cash transactions - whereas there were adjustments by way of book entries - When such being the case, initiation of proceedings against the petitioner appears to have been made under an wrong assumption that there was cash transaction. - Appellate authorities directed to consider the case afresh without insisting pre-deposit - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 11:30:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 11:30:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reconsideration Ordered for Penalty Case After Misclassification of Book Entries as Cash Transactions.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73987</link>
      <description>Stay of demand / waiver of pre-deposit - Penalty u/s 271E - Allegation of cash transactions - whereas there were adjustments by way of book entries - When such being the case, initiation of proceedings against the petitioner appears to have been made under an wrong assumption that there was cash transaction. - Appellate authorities directed to consider the case afresh without insisting pre-deposit - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 11:30:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>