https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311625 In a second appeal, Section 100 CPC requires the High Court to formulate a substantial question of law before hearing and deciding the matter; an unformulated question can be considered only for recorded reasons under the proviso. As no substantial question of law was formulated before disposal, the High Court did not comply with the statutory mandate and its judgment could not stand. The Supreme Court therefore set aside the High Court's judgment in the second appeal and the review order, and remitted the matter for fresh disposal after proper formulation of the substantial question of law. en-us Wed, 01 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jan 2024 10:14:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311625 In a second appeal, Section 100 CPC requires the High Court to formulate a substantial question of law before hearing and deciding the matter; an unformulated question can be considered only for recorded reasons under the proviso. As no substantial question of law was formulated before disposal, the High Court did not comply with the statutory mandate and its judgment could not stand. The Supreme Court therefore set aside the High Court's judgment in the second appeal and the review order, and remitted the matter for fresh disposal after proper formulation of the substantial question of law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311625