<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 223 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447824</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, and the Special Leave Petitions were dismissed after hearing both sides. No substantive legal issue was decided in the order, and the pending applications, if any, were disposed of consequentially. The document therefore records only the procedural outcome of the Supreme Court&#039;s consideration, without any reported adjudication on the merits of the income-tax controversy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 223 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447824</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, and the Special Leave Petitions were dismissed after hearing both sides. No substantive legal issue was decided in the order, and the pending applications, if any, were disposed of consequentially. The document therefore records only the procedural outcome of the Supreme Court&#039;s consideration, without any reported adjudication on the merits of the income-tax controversy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>