<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 220 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447821</link>
    <description>Receipts under a hotel strategic oversight services arrangement were held not to constitute royalty because the payment was for integrated management and oversight services, with access to know-how, information, and software being merely ancillary; the receipts were treated as business income. The same arrangement was found to create a fixed place permanent establishment in India because the foreign enterprise had effective control over the hotel premises through long-term operational supervision, deployment of personnel, and strategic decision-making. The note records a mixed result: the royalty finding was rejected, the permanent establishment finding was upheld, and profit attribution remained for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2024 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 220 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447821</link>
      <description>Receipts under a hotel strategic oversight services arrangement were held not to constitute royalty because the payment was for integrated management and oversight services, with access to know-how, information, and software being merely ancillary; the receipts were treated as business income. The same arrangement was found to create a fixed place permanent establishment in India because the foreign enterprise had effective control over the hotel premises through long-term operational supervision, deployment of personnel, and strategic decision-making. The note records a mixed result: the royalty finding was rejected, the permanent establishment finding was upheld, and profit attribution remained for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>