<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 170 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35315</link>
    <description>Where no express statutory limitation period governs initiation of fiscal penalty proceedings, a reasonable period must be implied into the statute. Applying that principle, proceedings begun after more than five years were held to be beyond a reasonable period and therefore unsustainable. The challenge to the Tribunal&#039;s order failed, and the appellate order was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 170 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35315</link>
      <description>Where no express statutory limitation period governs initiation of fiscal penalty proceedings, a reasonable period must be implied into the statute. Applying that principle, proceedings begun after more than five years were held to be beyond a reasonable period and therefore unsustainable. The challenge to the Tribunal&#039;s order failed, and the appellate order was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>