<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 214 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447815</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee regarding allocation of general corporate expenses between STPI and non-STPI units under section 10A deduction. The assessee maintained separate books and consistently allocated expenses based on turnover ratios - STPI turnover to total turnover for STPI units, and domestic turnover to total turnover for non-STPI units. The tribunal found the assessing officer&#039;s reallocation untenable as the revenue failed to justify their basis, while the assessee followed scientific allocation principles. The revenue had previously accepted this methodology for assessment years 2008-09 to 2012-13. The CIT(A) order was set aside, directing acceptance of the assessee&#039;s allocation method.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 08:47:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 214 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447815</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee regarding allocation of general corporate expenses between STPI and non-STPI units under section 10A deduction. The assessee maintained separate books and consistently allocated expenses based on turnover ratios - STPI turnover to total turnover for STPI units, and domestic turnover to total turnover for non-STPI units. The tribunal found the assessing officer&#039;s reallocation untenable as the revenue failed to justify their basis, while the assessee followed scientific allocation principles. The revenue had previously accepted this methodology for assessment years 2008-09 to 2012-13. The CIT(A) order was set aside, directing acceptance of the assessee&#039;s allocation method.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>