<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 88 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35313</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on mobile phone services and maintenance of motor vehicles was examined under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, with reference to the CBEC circular on mobile telephone services. Credit was considered available where the services were used in or in relation to business operations, and incidental personal use by employees did not by itself justify denial. The absence of complete vehicle records or some blank entries was not enough to show that the services were wholly outside business use. Credit was admissible within the allotted limits, while excess mobile usage and vehicle use required further verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 15:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 88 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35313</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on mobile phone services and maintenance of motor vehicles was examined under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, with reference to the CBEC circular on mobile telephone services. Credit was considered available where the services were used in or in relation to business operations, and incidental personal use by employees did not by itself justify denial. The absence of complete vehicle records or some blank entries was not enough to show that the services were wholly outside business use. Credit was admissible within the allotted limits, while excess mobile usage and vehicle use required further verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>