<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 194 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447795</link>
    <description>The conjunctive wording of a customs exemption exclusion for &quot;MIMO and LTE products&quot; was read according to its ordinary meaning, so the exclusion applied only where both technologies were present. The text of the amended notification and the settled approach to exemption interpretation supported a narrow construction, preventing expansion of the exclusion beyond its express scope. On that basis, MIMO-only access points were held not to fall within the exclusion and therefore remained eligible for customs duty exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 194 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447795</link>
      <description>The conjunctive wording of a customs exemption exclusion for &quot;MIMO and LTE products&quot; was read according to its ordinary meaning, so the exclusion applied only where both technologies were present. The text of the amended notification and the settled approach to exemption interpretation supported a narrow construction, preventing expansion of the exclusion beyond its express scope. On that basis, MIMO-only access points were held not to fall within the exclusion and therefore remained eligible for customs duty exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>