<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 139 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35311</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the credit of duty paid on security services used for residential purposes near the factory. The judgment emphasized the importance of input services related to business operations, even if they are for residential purposes. This decision provided consequential relief to the appellant, affirming their entitlement to avail the credit for the duty paid on security services utilized for residential purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 139 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35311</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the credit of duty paid on security services used for residential purposes near the factory. The judgment emphasized the importance of input services related to business operations, even if they are for residential purposes. This decision provided consequential relief to the appellant, affirming their entitlement to avail the credit for the duty paid on security services utilized for residential purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>