<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court: Set-off Rights Need Formal Assertion During Corporate Insolvency, Not Automatic with RP Control.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73971</link>
    <description>CIRP - Right to claim set-off in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, when the RP proceeds to take custody and control of all the assets of the corporate debtor - The argument that insolvency set-off is automatic and self-executing rejected - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 08:45:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 08:45:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court: Set-off Rights Need Formal Assertion During Corporate Insolvency, Not Automatic with RP Control.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73971</link>
      <description>CIRP - Right to claim set-off in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, when the RP proceeds to take custody and control of all the assets of the corporate debtor - The argument that insolvency set-off is automatic and self-executing rejected - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 08:45:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>