https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311617 The court addressed multiple writ petitions challenging the jurisdiction of the NFRA under Section 132(1) of the Companies Act, 2013. The petitions questioned NFRA's authority over matters predating its establishment. The court allowed legal representation for the petitioners and ordered that the jurisdictional issue be decided first. All petitioners were instructed to coordinate and present their jurisdictional arguments collectively to streamline proceedings. The petitions were disposed of without costs, with interim applications and orders vacated. The jurisdictional decision will be the sole order if it favors the petitioners. en-us Tue, 13 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jan 2024 20:23:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311617 The court addressed multiple writ petitions challenging the jurisdiction of the NFRA under Section 132(1) of the Companies Act, 2013. The petitions questioned NFRA's authority over matters predating its establishment. The court allowed legal representation for the petitioners and ordered that the jurisdictional issue be decided first. All petitioners were instructed to coordinate and present their jurisdictional arguments collectively to streamline proceedings. The petitions were disposed of without costs, with interim applications and orders vacated. The jurisdictional decision will be the sole order if it favors the petitioners. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 13 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311617