https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311615 The Tribunal recalled its previous order dated 23.03.2022 in ITA No. 1034 & 1035/M/2010 and ITA No.2041/M/2010, following an application by the assessee, M/s. Tech Mahindra Ltd., under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal acknowledged the failure to consider a pertinent decision by the Bombay HC in CIT-9 Vs. M/s. Indo American Jewellery Ltd. concerning interest on credits to USA-Associated Enterprises. The order was recalled to allow the assessee a fresh hearing, addressing the oversight and preventing further litigation. en-us Mon, 04 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jan 2024 20:23:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311615 The Tribunal recalled its previous order dated 23.03.2022 in ITA No. 1034 & 1035/M/2010 and ITA No.2041/M/2010, following an application by the assessee, M/s. Tech Mahindra Ltd., under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal acknowledged the failure to consider a pertinent decision by the Bombay HC in CIT-9 Vs. M/s. Indo American Jewellery Ltd. concerning interest on credits to USA-Associated Enterprises. The order was recalled to allow the assessee a fresh hearing, addressing the oversight and preventing further litigation. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 04 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311615