<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1505 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311598</link>
    <description>ITAT Kolkata ruled that amalgamation reserve created in books of amalgamated company cannot be treated as income under section 28(iv) read with section 2(24)(vd). The tribunal held that such reserve is merely an accounting entry to balance books under double entry system, not representing real income or any benefit/perquisite from business activity. Following precedent from Delhi HC, the tribunal confirmed that when share exchange is based on fair valuation, no taxable benefit arises. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 20:23:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1505 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311598</link>
      <description>ITAT Kolkata ruled that amalgamation reserve created in books of amalgamated company cannot be treated as income under section 28(iv) read with section 2(24)(vd). The tribunal held that such reserve is merely an accounting entry to balance books under double entry system, not representing real income or any benefit/perquisite from business activity. Following precedent from Delhi HC, the tribunal confirmed that when share exchange is based on fair valuation, no taxable benefit arises. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>